New Israeli and U.S. Conditions Raise Serious Alarms for Iran

According to Rokna in a joint letter to the United Nations, the foreign ministers of China, Russia, and Iran opposed the activation of the snapback mechanism by three European countries, expressing concern over its potential implications.

Sadatian stated: “The conditions currently announced by the United States and Israel are clearly sensitive and dangerous on the international stage. While they may appear limited to nuclear agreements, there is no denying that these conditions could significantly influence overall international and diplomatic decision-making. At present, all eyes are on a key decision expected from the UN Security Council, which is anticipated to clarify the future path and define the current status of regional developments and international agreements.”

He continued: “The foreign ministers of China, Russia, and Iran have sent similar messages to the President of the Security Council, calling for careful and impartial consideration. The letters stressed that the Security Council should not be influenced by unilateral pressures or political agendas, and that all decisions must adhere to international principles and law. A central issue concerns the extension of the snapback suspension. Under the proposed plan, if activation is postponed by six months, it would move from April to October, providing additional time for consultations and reducing immediate pressures on Iran, thus allowing for a more cautious and measured approach by the Security Council.”

Sadatian further emphasized the structural advantage of the United States within the Security Council: “Despite the recent efforts of Iran, China, and Russia, the current composition favors the U.S., granting it considerable leverage over Council decisions. Nevertheless, regional complexities, Israel’s desire for military confrontation, and the U.S.’ reluctance to engage militarily intensify the diplomatic sensitivity. Israel openly seeks to prevent any tangible outcome in Iran-U.S. negotiations, rendering the diplomatic landscape fragile and delicate.”

He also highlighted Tehran’s measured approach: “Our president recently demonstrated a strategic response, emphasizing readiness for dialogue conditional on justice in negotiations. This reflects Iran’s effort to balance political and security resilience while managing pressures and safeguarding national interests. Although European nations appear steadfast in their positions, they are likely to respond to Iranian initiatives during this one-month window. Activation of the snapback mechanism would effectively increase pressures on Iran, imposing further economic and diplomatic constraints. Hence, the decision to delay or activate it is crucial.”

Sadatian concluded: “No one can predict with certainty whether the mechanism will be activated, but diplomatic efforts will continue. The Security Council’s role in this matter is unparalleled. Its decisions, particularly regarding the snapback, could shape international pathways and regional policies. These decisions will not only influence the current situation but also affect political stability, security, and the credibility of international institutions in the years ahead. History shows that rushed or pressured decisions in sensitive matters can have destructive effects on negotiations and regional stability. Various countries are pursuing pressure strategies to increase their influence. Overall, the suspension or activation of the snapback mechanism represents one of the most complex and sensitive international dossiers in recent years. The conditions imposed by the U.S. and Israel, regional pressures, European involvement, and Iran’s resilience are all intertwined in a diplomatic network whose outcomes will impact not only Iran’s relations with the world but also the stability and security of the entire region. Iran is pursuing a cautious yet decisive policy aimed at preserving its path while mitigating international pressures.”