New Israeli–U.S. Conspiracy Against Iran: Decoding the Middle East Developments

On Saturday, October 4, former U.S. President Donald Trump released an aerial map announcing Israel’s initial approval of a phased withdrawal from the Gaza Strip — a plan he claimed had also been shared with Hamas. Formal talks on the implementation of this proposal reportedly began the following day. However, critical questions remain about the long-term viability of Trump’s Gaza plan and the broader intentions of both Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Jalilvand said “It is unclear to what extent Israel and Hamas will remain committed to this agreement. Israeli analysts believe Hamas accepted Trump’s proposal merely to ease immediate pressures, while preparing for the next phase of conflict.”

He added that Hamas’s acceptance of the agreement was conditional, reflecting skepticism on both sides:

“The peace or truce initiative framed under Trump’s proposal needs more time before a clear judgment can be made. Even from the Israeli side, there seems to be no real willingness to fully comply, as they still hold the upper hand militarily. Nevertheless, international opinion and global diplomatic pressure may push both parties to accept the deal to some degree — though their long-term commitment remains uncertain.”

“Middle East Developments Are No Coincidence”

Jalilvand went on to argue that current events in the Middle East are part of a calculated long-term plan by Israel and the United States:

“If we look at Netanyahu’s rhetoric — particularly his emphasis on the complete disarmament of Hamas — it becomes evident that Iran will eventually be placed next on their agenda. The unfolding regional dynamics are not coincidental. Israel and the U.S. are following a deliberate, long-term strategy, and I believe Iran will soon become a focal point of that plan.”

He noted that both Washington and Tel Aviv appear to believe diplomatic channels with Tehran have failed:

“Reaching an agreement with Iran seems to have moved beyond the framework of negotiation. The Americans claim Iran has requested talks several times without success, while Iran insists it will not engage under conditions of maximum pressure. The Europeans, for their part, follow Washington’s lead and add their occasional warnings, but ultimately they remain subordinate to U.S. policy.”

Jalilvand concluded that the U.S. and Israel’s strategic focus is shifting from Gaza toward broader regional containment of Iran, a trend that may define the next phase of Middle Eastern geopolitics.